On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:23:53AM +0300, Henrik K wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 03:48:34PM +1200, Sidney Markowitz wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > > > I was going over open bugs in order of priority/severity setting and noticed > > bug 7676 > > https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7676 > > > > I think I understand how we do things now, but not why we do it. > > > > First of all, can someone explain why there are two separate runs? If the > > two versions have different uses, how does anyone choose which one they will > > use? If one is "better" than the other, why not publish just that one? > > > > Also, is there a reason not to use a suffix on the svn rev number to > > distinguish the two daily runs, updating the DNS txt records twice a day > > instead of once?? That way there would be no caching problems. Would it > > require anything else to be changed that depends on the number being the > > exact svn revision? > > Pretty bizarre that mkupdate-with-scores and run_nightly do the same things > creating tarballs, but test with different versions etc. Seems pretty clear > to me that only one of them should do the tarball. A timeline of script > actions need to be created to analyze this. > > Who's even on this list? Probably should continue on the bug for wider > committer audience.
Well, I closed this bug since it was not an issue as is. But there should be some code cleanups. It seems run_nightly wastes time creating tarballs for no purpose at all.
