> That means that the ranges should be different for every thread. I tried to > simulate that by > params[i] = sb_rand(thread_id, oltp_table_size) > > Maybe there is a better way to handle this? >
Yes, I think there should be a better way. Given that the number of threads is typically much lower than oltp_table_size, there will be a significant overlap in produced ranges for random values, i.e. they won't be that different. To prevent overlapping (i.e. make them really different) you need to partition the whole table into num_threads segments and then make each thread work with its own segment. That is, something like: params[i] = sb_rand(oltp_table_size / num_threads * thread_id, oltp_table_size / num_threads * (thread_id + 1)). Does this make sense? -- https://code.launchpad.net/~hakan-askmonty/sysbench/hakan/+merge/39548 Your team sysbench-developers is subscribed to branch lp:sysbench. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sysbench-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sysbench-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
