> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sez:
> The following is no new thought, but a blinding flash of the obvious ... I
> suppose we are all in the "requirements collection" phase. Nevertheless it
> is a good idea to check what is available right now. This is not really
> "implementation", but merely "investigating what has been required at some
> point in time". The more input (and reference code, for later) the better.
Sounds good to me. I don't consider myself worthy of going over the
implementations; actually I think it'd be great to have the implementers
critique the others and say what the requirements were for their systems.
Has anyone else compared or checked out these things seriously?
> The next is more important for me: logging and time synchronisation should
> be completely independent from each other.
Agreed...
dan
