At 10:44 PM 10/20/1999 +1000, Darren Reed wrote:
>In some email I received from Andreas Siegert, sie wrote:
>[...]
>> ot: Old text record / free form text record (this is always the last tag)
>> st: Original senders time stamp
>> si: Original senders ip
>> sk: Original senders key (whatever this turns out to be)
>> sh: Original senders hash of the message it sends
>> fi: Forwarders ip (there mitght be multiple)
>> ft: Forwarders time stamp
>> fk: Forwarders key (whatever this turns out to be)
>>
>> Each tag is preceded by a space and there should be no space after the
colon.
>> Apart from the free form record no field can have text that looks like a
tag.
>>
>> maybe a bit simplistic...
>
>See the ULM draft for a more complete picture of that nightmare.
Maybe I'm just having an unusually dim week, but am not sure what your main
objections are to that document. If you have a brief summary you'd care to
forward, I'm sure others would also appreciate it.
I'll also go have a look at www.hsc.fr/gulp and will perhaps be enlightened.
Bob
