On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 11:12:11AM +0200, Magosanyi Arpad wrote: > > ...huh? It's the last line before the "last message repeated" lines. > > Not exactly. This is the last message from the same source before the > "last line repeated". They can easily be kilobytes away. > > Having a mechanism which logs the first occurence immediately and > repetition count later is a Good Thing IMHO. Just we need > some mechanism to easily correlate those messages. If the client cache the first occurrence and send both this occurrence and the "last.." message together specifing that this two lines must be logged attached it may work but require some protocol enhancement. Without this trick is still possible to search the previous line of the host but with a lot of clients/logs it's a bit uncomfortable. I think that this isn't an issue that can justify a protocol enhancement. antirez
