Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Proposed priorities:
>> 1-10 (info - debug)
>IMHO the current set of 8 priorities would suffice. And nothing prevents us
>to use more than 24 facilities, since the protocol itself allows this.
This is a good point. Following KIS guidelines there would be no more
priorities than reasonably required. Since 8 would be backwards
compatible, and I've never seen more than 3 or 4 used at any one time,
syslog2/syslogV2 would ideally support no more than 8 priorities.
--
Roger Marquis
Roble Systems Consulting
http://www.roble.com/
