Re: FYI -- Re: XML Digital Signatures (xmldsig) for securing network event logging?

[by way of "Chris M. Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

GRRRR!  - A.



From:   "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/27/99 04:08 PM GMT
Sent by:        "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



At 11:16 99/10/27 -0400, Alex Brown wrote:
 >>>>
(1)  Comments?  Do you know of related work?
<<<<

Alex, I don't know of any XML security (confidentiality) standards and
we are not chartered to deliver one. However it has been noted that
once we define all the syntax/structures for the signatures one may be
able to provide confidentiality with minimal to no changes. This might
be something we do in a future rechartering once we've met our current
requirements.

 >>>>
(2) Are there drafts of the RFCs identified in the "Deliverables"
section of the xmldsig charter page?  Can I obtain them?
<<<<

For drafts and their history, the best place to look is:
         http://www.w3.org/Signature/#drafts

 >>>>
(3)  Would you be interested in providing liason at the syslog BOF meeting?
<<<<

Since it is only a BOF, I assume you are not proposing a formal
liason/dependency/requirement, but it certainly makes sense to
participate if possible. What day/evening is the BOF scheduled for?





_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr.
Policy Analyst           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://w3.org/People/Reagle/







[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/27/99 02:46:03 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:    (Alex Brown/US/3Com)
Subject:  Re: FYI -- Re: XML Digital Signatures (xmldsig) for securing
        network  event logging?







Looks like Notes dropped the body of Reagle's reply.   Grrr.  -- Alex