Balazs Scheidler wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 05:03:44AM -0500, Chris Calabrese wrote:
> > Have you talked to the IDWG folks? Presumably they're dealing with the
> > same issues.
>
>not yet.
There is very little attention to transport security in the current IDWG drafts,
e.g. draft-ietf-idwg-iap-00.txt, where in sec. 7 "Security Considerations" are
addressed
with the comment, "As IAP is intended to be used for carrying security--sensitive data,
we will list a number of security considerations." The principal concern of IDWG is a
data
representation of intrusion detection reports for multivendor interchange. I remain
unconvinced that there is actually much overlap between IDWG and the secure syslog
issue.
Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Alex Brown
<http://www.msg.com/~abrown>http://www.msg.com<http://www.msg.com/~abrown>/~abrown +1
617 504 8761
