In his/her message, Chris Lonvick wrote:
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 11 10:37:31 2000
>Our charter does require us to transport the current messages. I do
>understand that there is a strong contingent of people on this list
>who would like to establish a standard message format (XML has been
>mentioned) and I am sympathetic to that cause. While that is outside
Thank you, but,
>the scope of this working group at this time, I'd like for the
I think that standardization of the transport without standardization
of the message format is difficult. The standardization of the message
format and the security associated with message format may influence the
transport protocol.
>transports that we do agree upon to be able to also transport any
>future event message formats. If any of the people on the list feel
>that our work/discussions are diverting from that, I'd appreciate it
>if they would bring it to our attention.
Regards,
HERVE
