In some email I received from Chris Lonvick, sie wrote:
[...]
> If we agree upon these changes, I feel that I will need to fully
> stipulate the code set for the "<" and ">" characters along with the
> numbers used in the PRI value. Let's work out the language in the
> proposal above and then I'll take a whack at that.
Or maybe the message needs to be considered split into two "logical"
sections: one containing "control" information (priority, date, time,
etc) and the other one contains free form text (the message itself)
which can be of any character set.
Darren
