-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 11:19 AM 12/9/00 -0800, Darren New wrote:
>Chris Calabrese wrote:
>> OK, so you're assuming this is on top of syslog-auth.
>> I have no problem with that, but just wanted to be
>> sure.
>
>Actually, I was hoping that syslog-sign could be something
>compatible with syslog-reliable but not relying on
>syslog-auth. I.e., it would give the end-to-end integrity
>guarantee that syslog-reliable currently lacks.
Syslog-sign does NOT rely on syslog-auth. Syslog-sign uses
a couple of the same elements (reboot session ID, for
example) in its signature blocks that syslog-auth uses, but
syslog-sign requires only syslog. One of the main features
of syslog-sign is that it doesn't require anything else to
start adding security.
>Darren New / Senior MTS & Free Radical / Invisible Worlds Inc.
- --John Kelsey, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.1 Int. for non-commercial use
<http://www.pgpinternational.com>
Comment: foo
iQCVAwUBOjKvzSZv+/Ry/LrBAQGQCAQApz/H+Y6h+nfstRJKMN7Y+a54BJl5gs9N
NMv+lYUZ/5u9KgL+TPbWZ12Mn0ixzK7ScVhMQUKANJsqkUpiZX9cb4ZUXqCj+atb
At5cNsh0heva1WZHZxzj41NqIVR4u5FaVYqzGD1vBsuxxKKd8sw3cfchwLsafRbo
MSPSDRBUlLA=
=sNF2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
