I don't know about you guys, but I can feel my Korean already beginning to suffer. :-)
Defining the objectives and requirements for remote configuration and management of the various syslog protocols might be a good starting point. I had been trying to limit the management to syslog devices, but we could consider relays and collectors if there is sufficient interest. I can find the time to do the MIB work if we can reach a consensus as to our objectives. Thanks, Bruno -----Original Message----- From: Chris M. Lonvick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Where We Are Hi Everyone, I've updated the web page here: http://www.employees.org/~lonvick/index.shtml We have 2 items remaining before us. We need comments upon the syslog-sign-05 ID and the syslog-device-mib-00 ID. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-sign-05.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-device-mib-00.txt Please get those notes coming in. :-) I'll have to say that moderating the list is not a problem and it sure gets rid of a lot of junk. Many thanks, Chris
