---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 06:43:22 +0100
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Remarks on syslog-sign (draft 07)

{Resend, because oif wrong To:]

Hi All,

Been a bit busy lately, but catching up soon, I hoop.
But a quick responds on a comment on a comment ..


 >>>** The TAG is defined to be ending ('MUST')with a _colon_.
 >>> This wrong, as rfc3164 defines it can end with a _space_
 >>>Adv   Rewrite: it terminates with any not alfanum char.


 > We discussed (a long time ago) that the TAG should be included in the
 > HEADER rather than in the MSG for people writing code.

Very true, It was I who made the suggestion ...

 > This should mean that the TAG should be able to contain things like:
 >    syslog[1234]:
 > Since the next character may, or may not be a space, [...]

 > I'll suggest that the colon stay.

The point is, syslog-sign messages should be syslog-rfc3164 "parsable".
And, syslog-sign-deamons should handle "old" syslog messages.
In other words: when a UDP message is arriving over the syslog-port, the
daemon should be able to handle (so parse) it. WITHOUT knowing it is
syslog-rfc3164 or -sign.
Based on my implementation, we need the space "definition" in the
syslog-sign rfc, to make a 100% correct implementation.

I have to look up the work for details, I hope you trust "my word" :-)

NB traditional syslog can be without the colon!


 > That does bring up a point, however.  In "traditional" syslog messages,
 > there is nothing between the ":" and the message itself in many cases.
 > Should there be a space between the ":" and the Signature Block, and the
 > Certifiate Block in the syslog-sign messages?  If so then a Signature
 > Block would look like:
 >    syslog[1234]: @#sigSIG 0111 ...
 > and the Certificate Block would be:
 >    syslog[1234]: @#sigCER 0111 ...

Based on early posting(s): I suggest to allow one or more spaces between
ANY 2 syslog-sign-fields. (for reading). And send 1 space between any 2
fields. Personally, I would like to have 2 spaces at the frond. It make
(manual) parsing nice. But that only a matter of style.


--ALbert Mietus
Sent prive mail to:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent business  mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
--ALbert Mietus
Sent prive mail to:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent business  mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to