Issue 8: Length of syslog messages http://www.employees.org/~lonvick/draft-ietf-syslog-sign-12.html#format
>From the Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01118.html http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01119.html http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01120.html STATUS: Resolved that 1) senders should try to keep packets within the 1024octet limit. (Address this in the Security Considerations section?) 2) receivers shouldn't panic if they are given a packet greater than 1024 octects. (Again, address this in the Security Considerations section?) 3) Very long messages may be separated into multiple syslog packets and it would be nice if they were numbered so they could be reassembled without having to look at the timestamp. That will not be addressed in syslog-sign but Rainer will take a look at it for inclusion in syslog-international or a subsequent document. >From the Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01249.html http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01252.html http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01253.html http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01254.html http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01255.html http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01256.html http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01257.html http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01257.html
