Rainer Gerhards writes:
> > The PROGNAME part is special, as it is frequently used by relays to
> > determine the routing of a message. As a note to implementors: it
> > can be found by getting the visual part before the first occurrence
> > of '[', and after the last '\' of '/' part of that segment.
> mmhhh... I can see the reasoning for this, but do you think we really
> need to allow [ inside the path? Without it, implementing would be
> easier. In my experience, parsing strings backwards (as would be
> required) seems somehow more error-prone than forward parsing (but maybe
> it's just me failing in those cases ;))
Just to inform:
* It not needed to parse backward. It can be done in 1 for-loop
(see my implementation)
* Currerently, several (Unix) programmes use this path approach. The
log tags like " postfix/local[33282]:"
* I did found posting from this WG that resulted in this idea. I think
Rainer posted some Window alinke paths as "C\to\Progrmam" ;-)
Hope it help
--
ALbert Mietus
Send prive mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send business mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't send spam mail!
