Replying to myself, I have just read
draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls-12.txt
which covers an almost identical  territory to transport-tls with server and
client roles reversed; worth a read.

Where we referred to RFC2818, it refers to RFC4642 (which itself considers
relays).

It has a reference to RFC5280 and specifies section 6 for certificate paths.

It does not consider fingerprinting.

It does not consider alternatives to hostname.

And as I have said before, I see a crying need for a generic 'application over
...' I-D for others to draw on and reference, so we do not keep inventing our
(square?) wheels.

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "tom.petch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rainer Gerhards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Syslog] -transport-tls references to "matching rules"


> I think that the I-D has got a bit mangled.
>
> I liked, and may have been responsible for, the reference to RFC2818 as being
an
> example of the checks to perform on a certificate, written about a well-known
> application by someone familiar with TLS:-)  This was the basis for our
> validation rules, CN deprecated, subjectAltName must be used as an identity
etc
> and it helped (me) to know where they came from.
>
> The mention of certificates warranted a reference and that was provided by
> RFC3280.  This reference was never about validation rules.
>
> We did not used to have certificate path validation.  We do now and I do not
> know a good reference for it; I agree that RFC3280 et seq is not it.  This
lack
> I see as a(nother?) deficiency on the part of the security engineers:-(
>
> Tom Petch
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rainer Gerhards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 8:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [Syslog] -transport-tls references to "matching rules"
>
>

_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog

Reply via email to