Looks ok. Some editorial suggestions
a} /SubjectAltName field/subjectAltName extension/ twice b} /ipAddress/iPAddress/ once c} PKI; expand the acronym on first use d} s5.1 need only refer to 4.2.2 not 4.2.1 e} " SerialNumber portion of the Subject Distinguished Name" I do not know what this; serialNumber of type X520SerialNumber? f} s5.5 should reference 5.3 and 5.4 not 5.2 g} s7.1, cross reference to s4.1 for the port number definition h} Should we add a reference for SHA-1? I would not bother for a pkix document, but for one aimed at network management, I think we should. [RFC 3174] Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 3:46 PM Subject: [Syslog] Please review draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls > Hi Folks, > > We're getting very close on this. Can we get some people to look it over > and let us know what you think? > > If you look it over and agree with the changes, we need some "I'm OK with > this" and "me too" responses. :-) > > For your convenience, the IETF tools people have provided a way to easily > see the diffs from the last version here: > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/syslog/draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls/ > > Thanks, > Chris & David > _______________________________________________ > Syslog mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
