On Jul 23, 2008, at 5:40 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
The current NIST-approved hash functions would already consume >50%
of the number space for hash algorithms (and we can expect more
algorithms the hash algorithm competition). Thus, having a field
with only 10 possible values doesn't sound too good (even if the
protocol version field also allows some extensibility).
If we e.g. allowed using letters as well, we'd have 62 possible
values instead -- would that be a reasonable approach?
Yes.
Jon
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
