Hi Folks,
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: The IESG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice: draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls
'State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by
Cindy Morgan'
ID Tracker URL:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=14551&rfc_flag=0
---------- Forwarded message ----------
It looks like the telechat is over and we have some DISCUSSes and COMMENTs
to clear before the document becomes an RFC. The real meat is here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/ballot/2334/
We've already cleared the issue about a system port v. a registered port.
(The IESG is now debating the distinction between system and registered
ports but that's clearly outside of our discussion in this WG.)
We can easily clear Tim Polk's COMMENT
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls/comment/84805/?
(I've reviewed and agree and would like a second on this.)
Joe is looking at the other issues raised by Chris Newman.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls/comment/84852/?
He'll likely have some answers early next week. Please provide input on
this to the list.
Thanks,
Chris
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
