Hi Chris, I remembered that the wg will take "draft-feng-syslog-transport-dtls" as the basic start of wg's work on syslog-dtls, does it not make as the wg's decision?
If my memory is wrong, I would like recommend highly that take my proposal as the start of the wg's work, since my proposal has aligned with RFC 5425 (syslog/tls). I would like also contribute myself on the work of syslog-dtls. Linda ----- Original Mail ----- > Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:50:53 -0700 (PDT) > From: Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> > Subject: [Syslog] syslog WG meeting minutes (proposed) > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > Hi Folks, > > Here are the meeting minutes that I took. Please send back edits if > you > want anything changed. > > === > Meeting was started, blue sheets passed around, no one in jabber room > > other than the people in the room. > > Chairs went through the slides. > > Q about syslog/BEEP on slide 10: We're not proposing to standardize > this; > it's already RFC 3195. Since the uptake on implementation (of this > RFC, > and of BEEP overall) is low, then the WG should consider moving the > RFC to > HISTORIC. > > Jurgen S. gave a review of his thoughts on the proposed new charter items: > Slide 8, > MIB, OK > DHCP, has some operational value > don't need an architectural reference to be done in the IETF > Slide 9 > might be interesting to have a guideline but not sure who would commit > the time to do that > DTLS, should be done and aligned with RFC 5425 (syslog/tls) > syslog/tcp, should be very straightforward and easy to do > syslog/BEEP, declare HISTORIC > > Dan R. - Since syslog WG is proposing to do syslog/DTLS is there > enough > commonality so that ISMS/DTLS and IPFIX/DTLS can re-use? > - Consensus was that this was likely. David also noted that the others > are also doing SCTP. > > Pasi E. - syslog/DTLS should be easy since it will draw directly from > > syslog/TLS. > - IPFIX also working on Dead Peer Detection (DTLS Heartbeet), we should > likely support this as well. > - There were problems with the previous IPFIX/DTLS but that was because > of bad libraries in OpenSSL which have since been fixed. > > Wes H. - there is not that much commonality between the schemes > because of > a lot of useage details. > > Chris and David have asked Joe Saloway to act as WG editor for the > DTLS > work. > > Meeting adjurned at 10am. > > === > > Thanks, > Chris > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Syslog mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog > > > End of Syslog Digest, Vol 47, Issue 10 > ************************************** > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
