Hi Chris,

Thanks - but it really was Sharon who brought this forward and did the vast
majority of work. I primarily helped it to bootstrap :)

Thanks, Sharon!

Rainer 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Lonvick
> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 8:32 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Syslog] RFC 5674 on Alarms in Syslog (fwd)
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> Just passing this along.  Congratulations to Sharon and Reiner.
> 
> Best regards,
> Chris
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected], [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
> Subject: RFC 5674 on Alarms in Syslog
> 
> 
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> 
> 
>          RFC 5674
> 
>          Title:      Alarms in Syslog
>          Author:     S. Chisholm, R. Gerhards
>          Status:     Standards Track
>          Date:       October 2009
>          Mailbox:    [email protected],
>                      [email protected]
>          Pages:      7
>          Characters: 13837
>          Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
> 
>          I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-opsawg-syslog-alarm-02.txt
> 
>          URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5674.txt
> 
> This document describes how to send alarm information in syslog.  It
> includes the mapping of ITU perceived severities onto syslog message
> fields.  It also includes a number of alarm-specific SD-PARAM
> definitions from X.733 and the IETF Alarm MIB.  [STANDARDS TRACK]
> 
> This document is a product of the Operations and Management 
> Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
> 
> STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
> protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion 
> and suggestions
> for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
> Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
> status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
> 
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>    http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>    http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
> 
> For searching the RFC series, see 
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
> For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
> 
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to 
> [email protected].  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
> 
> 
> The RFC Editor Team
> USC/Information Sciences Institute
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
> _______________________________________________
> Syslog mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
> 
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog

Reply via email to