>>>>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:34:23 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder >>>>> <[email protected]> said:
>> -- cipher suites -- JS> This was discussed in the ISMS WG and I think we concluded that the JS> TLS specs define mandatory to implement cipher suites and that it is JS> counter productive to have our own list since we want to pick up new JS> mandatory cipher suites in case TLS specs move on because e.g. a JS> cipher is broken. In short, it is the job of the TLS specs to define JS> mandatory to implement ciphers. I agree; that's my recollection too (and one I agree with). -- Wes Hardaker Cobham Analytic Solutions _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
