Eliding the previously agreed parts Tom Petch
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lonvick" <[email protected]> To: "tom.petch" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:52 PM Subject: Re: [Syslog] Review comments on draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-01.txt > Hi Tom, > > I got all excited about the next version of draft-ietf-syslog-dtls getting > in before the cutoff time that I went ahead and edited plain-tcp. :-) > > Comments in-line. > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, tom.petch wrote: > <snip> > > And, perhaps the most important, somewhere I think you should cover the nature > > of TCP; give it a message and it will buffer it, may be for days, and then lose > > it because the connection is taken down. Should you recommend the use of PSH > > for all messages? > > CML> I added a paragraph near the end of the Introduction about that. > (Which I have not run by Rainer yet. :) Let me know if that's what you > were thinking about. Yes, your new paragraph is exactly what I had in mind. > CML> We appreciate the review. The updated draft should be out soon and > I'll ask for another review of it rsn. > > Thanks, > Chris > > > Tom Petch _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
