t.petch wrote:
I see that this I-D had entered 'Revised I-D needed' which I would like to
progress.
I see several comments about maximum record size, including a suggestion that we
should make the 'SHOULD NOT' a 'MUST NOT' exceed 2**14.
I am dead set against this change. We had a clear requirment, early on, to
allow 65k messages, and I think it wrong to MUST NOT that requirement. The text
in the other I-Ds is a compromise to strke a balance between this and having
everything fit in 576 byte; I think we have the balance right.
Tom,
My response to Alexey was that this I-D borrows that particular
requirement from RFC4347 and that this I-D shouldn't be upping the
requirement. If it's okay with you, I'll forward him your response.
The way I read his comment was that he's just asking why - he's not
really requesting a change.
spt
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
