Yes, I agree with this, that DCCP is recommended but only if it is available
(which I do not expect it to be:-) so update to s.6, leave s.5 alone.

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Lonvick" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 5:19 PM
Subject: [Syslog] Issue 8 - Tim Polk DISCUSS


> Issue 8 - Tim Polk DISCUSS
>
> Discuss:
> There seems to be an essential disconnect between the conformance
> rquirements and the deployment guidance in this specification
>
> The second paragraph of Section 6 Congestion Control states:
>
>     DCCP has congestion control.  For this reason the syslog over DTLS
>     over DCCP option is recommended in preference to the syslog over the
>     DTLS over UDP option.
>
> However, in Section 5.1,  Transport
>
>     DTLS can run over multiple transports.  Implementations of this
>     specification MUST support DTLS over UDP and SHOULD support DTLS over
>     DCCP [RFC5238].
>
> For alignment with Section 6, it would seem that "MUST support DTLS over
> DCCP" would be more appropriate.
>
> Proposed resolution by Sean:
> vvv
> As noted by Lars (before my time on either the IESG or syslog list):
>
>    If DCCP is available (not usually the case) running DTLS over it is
>    trivial, so you could also make this a MUST. DCCP support itself is
>    obviously not a MUST.
>
> Maybe what we really ought to be saying is Section 6 (which is just
> about congestion control):
>
>    DCCP has congestion control.  For this reason when DCCP is available,
>    syslog over DTLS over DCCP is recommended in preference to the syslog
>    over the DTLS over UDP option.
>
> and we leave Section 5 alone?
> ^^^
>
> Tim Polk responded:
> vvv
> I will defer to Lars on this one.  Since we can't make DCCP support a
> MUST, your suggested text for Section 6 would resolve what remains of my
> issue.
> ^^^
>
> ACTION:  Authors to review proposed resolution and discuss on list.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Syslog mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog

_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog

Reply via email to