I think that's what he's asking for too.
spt
t.petch wrote:
Presumably this is s5.4.1 where we lack the [ ] that are present in all other
references to RFC5425.
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Lonvick" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 5:19 PM
Subject: [Syslog] Issue 6 - Reference 2
Issue 6 - Reference 2
From Miguel Garcia (GENART review)
- Section 5.4.1: It would be nice to add a formal reference to RFC 5425
when it is mentioned.
ACTION: Authors to review and incorporate a change if needed.
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
