Most of this looks pretty straight forward: > Issue 8 - Tim Polk DISCUSS > STATUS: Discussed by Tom and David. Joe to incorporate changes. > [Joe] For this one I have Section 5 as:
"Implementations of this specification MUST support DTLS over UDP and MUST support DTLS over DCCP [RFC5238] if the DCCP transport is available at run-time." And section 6 as: " DCCP has congestion control. For this reason, when DCCP is available, the syslog over DTLS over DCCP option is RECOMMENDED in preference to the syslog over the DTLS over UDP option." I'm think the RECOMMENDED in the section 6 needs to be replaced with something else, I'm not quite sure what. > Issue 9, 9a, and 9b - from a Tim Polk COMMENT > STATUS: It looks like 9 and 9a have been discussed and Tom has proposed > text to resolve them. Sean proposed text on 9b. I'd like some discussion > on that. > [Joe] I'm not sure 9b is necessary, but I don't think it causes harm. I'd modify the text to say " implementations often generate their own key pairs" since its possible for the generation to be done outside the implementation. > Issue 10 - Jari Arrko DISCUSS > STATUS: Same as Issue 1. Is the text proposed by Sean good to cover all > of this Issue, Issue 1 and Issue 2? > [Joe] I incorporated the text, I'm not sure it covers all the issues, I think Tom initiated some discussion on the TLS list, but I don't think it changes the result. _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
