-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> It's discussed in section 5.4 (Unreliable Delivery - in the Security
> Considerations section) in RFC 5426 and throughout Section 3.1
> (Loss-Insensitive Messaging) in RFC 4347. I'm thinking that it would be good
> to note this in Section 4 (Using DTLS to Secure Syslog) in the draft.
>
> Overall, the community is comfortable with the loss of information as
> they've been using syslog/udp for many years and know the problems with that.
> RFC 5424 also notes that implementers who wish a lossless stream should be
> using tls/tcp as their transport. From that, it's probably best to reference
> RFC 5848 (referenced as draft-ietf-syslog-sign in the draft) which can also
> provide an indication of loss of messages. "
> ===^^^^===
>
> ACTION: I'd like to get some discussion going on this. Do people think that
> this is good?
I think a note somewhere reminding people that DTLS is unreliable, and that
syslog-sign protects both reliable and unreliable transports is reasonable, but
I wouldn't spend more than a sentence on each.
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.10.0 (Build 554)
Charset: us-ascii
wj8DBQFMH4yZsTedWZOD3gYRApWxAKDSm83JTiS9VAZW2Cu69HE77KOCfgCgrGvc
Z+SgfJhFZU8V3QouAhTMY3Y=
=PW/f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
