Hi WG, as it looks, there seems to be another implementation of RFC 3195. I am forwarding this from the RFC 3195 list.
Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Hall > Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 3:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Syslog] Reliable syslog rfc 3195 > > Hello everyone. > > I have a working 3195 server implementation. I'm looking for > people that > have a client and want to test it. It has already been tested > but I'd like > to test somemore. > I can also provide detailed network traffic to help you in > locating errors > (or my errors). > > If anyway is interested please email me directly. > > My server supports > > RAW, COOKED, TLS and SASL mech's. > > I've been concentrating on COOKED but I'd like to check the RAW also. > > Peter > > > _______________________________________________ > Syslog mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
