Anton, > (d) Do we have to address message observation threat? If not. > Then we don't need neither TLS/SSH - syslog-sign would do. > This does not prevent new transport to be used. Some can be > used by just underlying tunnels anyway.
Based on my (obviously limited) experience, this is the primary objective that leads to SSL deployments today. So it seems to be something that operators care about (which I can very well understand). Rainer _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
