Hi Tom,
You are correct.
I'll change that to:
Nov 2006 Submit a secure syslog transport mapping document to the
IESG for consideration as a PROPOSED STANDARD.
Thanks,
Chris
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Tom Petch wrote:
Chris
I notice that the body of the proposal takes a neutral stance towards which
secure transport but then specifies TLS in the milestones. I suggest that you
keep the milestones neutral as well, not because I expect any different but
because I think it more acceptable to those that will review it.
Tom Petch
---remainder deleted for brevity---
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
