We have chosen and used a consistent terminology up until the tls document, so I think that tls should come in line. I think I see its problem, of not wanting to use the phrase 'sender or relay' repeatedly, but in that case, it should generate a new term, not redefine a well-established one. For myself, I am comfortable with reusing 'sender or relay' in each case.
Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "David B Harrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 11:09 PM Subject: [Syslog] Tls-01 Hi, The definition of sender in syslog-tls-01 differs from that in syslog-protocol. In -protocol, the "sender" is the message generator. In -tls, the sender is the message sender, whether that entity generated the message or not, and "originator" is the generator of the message. The distinction is important for discussing transport isues common to both senders and relays. Can the WG please take a look at the differences in terminology, so we can settle on terms that can be used consistently in all our documents? Thanks, David Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] co-chair, Syslog WG _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
