On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 05:29 +0200, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > Bazsi, all, > > I am not really able to follow the thread, but let me put in an > important thought. > > We *must* allow LF inside the message. If we do not do that, it would > cause problems with -protocol. This issue has been discussed at length, > and there are good reasons for allowing it. So while I vote to use LF > for record delineation, I also say that this means LF MUST be escaped if > present in the actual message (transfer encoding). After being decoded, > LF may be present in MSG. > > Maybe this already has been said ;)
This makes sense. What about other control characters? -- Bazsi _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
