One review finding:
Section 4.1, TAG of syslog-protocol is a little different to the one of
bsd-syslog. In bsd-syslog(section 4.1.3) it is process name, but in
syslog-protocol (section A.1) it is combination of APP-NAME, PROCID, and
MSGID. So, for bsd-syslog, TAG should be "syslog"("syslog "? typo?), but for
syslog-protocol, APP-NAME should be "syslog".
Thanks!
Miao
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 4:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-sign document
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This message officially starts the Syslog Working Group Last
> Call for the following document:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-sign-18.txt
>
> The Working Group Last Call for this document will end September 11.
>
> To help get these document reviewed throughly, we are seeking
> volunteers to review the documents for the following special reviews:
> 1) Spelling and grammar,
> 2) boilerplates and reference review,
> 3) security review
>
> The chairs want to see a minimum number of content reviews
> before we submit the documents to the IESG. If you review the
> document and it looks fine, please post a statement that you
> have reviewed and found the document acceptable. Obviously,
> if it does not look acceptable please identify your
> objections, preferably with suggested text that would make it
> acceptable.
>
> Thanks,
> David Harrington
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> co-chair, Syslog WG
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Syslog mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
>
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
