I had reviewed -protocol, -udp and -signing, and with several minor comments on -protocol and -signing. I believe the documents are in good quality for being published as RFCs.
Thanks! Miao > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Lonvick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:35 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Syslog] Diffs on -protocol and -transport-udp > > Hi Folks, > > We need some more reviews of our documents. There has been > some discussion that the documents havn't changed much since > the last time we went through a WGLC. I've made some diffs > of -protocol and of -transport-udp so you can see what > changes have been made. > > Diff from protocol-14 and protocol-17 > http://www.employees.org/~lonvick/diff-14-17.html > > Diff from transport-udp-05 and transport-udp-07 > http://www.employees.org/~lonvick/diff-udp-07-05.html > > Please look these over and comment to the WG list that you > have done so. > At a minimum your review to the group should be that you have > read the document and are satisfied with its quality and > content that it can become an RFC. > > Thanks, > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > Syslog mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
