I have looked at this I-D and appreciate the increased explanation at the beginning. It leaves me clearer, but still thinking that this document steers a different course to the other syslog ones, in its focus on a group of syslog entities. It's not that there cannot be more than one syslog entity running in a given host, just that bundling them together into a table seems an artificial complication; other syslog MIB modules I see are scalar in approach.
Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "David B Harrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 4:44 PM Subject: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-mib document > Hi, > > This message officially starts the Syslog Working Group Last Call for > the following document: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-device-mib-09.tx > t > > The Working Group Last Call for this document will end September 25. > > To help get these document reviewed throughly, we are seeking > volunteers to review the documents for the following special reviews: > 1) Spelling and grammar, > 2) boilerplates and reference review, > 3) security review > > The chairs want to see a minimum number of content reviews before we > submit the documents to the IESG. If you review the document and it > looks fine, please post a statement that you have reviewed and found > the document acceptable. Obviously, if it does not look acceptable > please identify your objections, preferably with suggested text that > would make it acceptable. > > Thanks, > David Harrington > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > co-chair, Syslog WG _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
