Hi, Will the editors of the WGLC'd documents please collect the comments made for each of your documents into a single document, preferably text, and indicate what was done in the document to address the issue raised.
Send the summary document to the chairs, with a copy of your current in-process document containing the fixes thus far, so the chairs can review your fixes. Once we have reviewed the fixes, we may ask for some changes. Then we will have you publish a new I-D, which we will send to the WG. It would be good to separate the issues document into three sections: 1) purely editorial issues (spelling, grammar, etc.) 2) Closed issues Technical issues where consensus was obvious. For each issue, please describe who raised the issue, and how the document was changed to address the issue. The chairs will review the changes to make sure they represent what the chairs consider to be WG consensus. 3) Open issues Technical issues where the resolution is unclear. Please identify who raised the issue. If you have a proposed fix, please describe it. The chairs will review the issues and determine whether it is an issue that needs resolution, whether your proposal is acceptable and in keeping with WG consensus, or whether it needs to be discussed further by the WG. Thanks, David Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
