David Harrington (co-chair of the Syslog WG) specifically asked me for a review of documents in WG Last Call.
I am not subscribed to the SYSLOG WG mailing list, so pls copy me explicitly on any reactions that you want me to see. Bert ----- draft-ietf-syslog-transport-udp-07.txt Seems fine to me. Two remarks - it may not be 100% clear that the reference [2] is to the new WG document: draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-17.txt - I hope it is OK with TSV area that there is no mandatory retae limiting in the number of syslog messages that can be sent. Bert ----------- original review message: > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-17.txt > > > > > > Transmission of syslog messages over UDP > > > > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-transport-udp-07 > > > .txt > > > > > > TLS Transport Mapping for SYSLOG > > > > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls-03 > > > .txt > > > > > > Syslog Management Information Base > > > > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-device-mib-09.tx > > > t > > > > > > Signed syslog Messages > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-sign-18.txt > > > (We expect this document to be updated this week.) > > > > > > David Harrington > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
