I agree; make it obsolete, acknowledging the role it has had in moving syslog along.
Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anton Okmianski (aokmians)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Rainer Gerhards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 7:12 PM Subject: RE: [Syslog] RFC 3164 Rainer: I think it should be marked as obsoleted by the new RFC, which I believe is commonly done. Why bother updating an obsoleted document? How much common will you find in the wild aside from PRI? Thanks, Anton. > -----Original Message----- > From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 11:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Syslog] RFC 3164 > <snip> _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
