>>>>> "RR" == Reno Reckling <e-syst...@wthack.de> writes:
RR> So there is in fact some shellscript-calling involved. Perhaps the goal exagerated the eventual code. Or maybe the backlash changed the plans. (I'd forgotten until just now, but the init.d/net code, especially, was very bash-riented and they didn't want to have the change that fact.) RR> The main question is, whether i try to reuse the named shell script RR> and copy some portions of the openrc source, or whether i rewrite RR> the deptree handling code as the openrc code would bloat the systemd RR> tree. I have to agree with avoiding bloat. A closer look shows that you were most likely on the right track. (init.d/net.lo may make the heaviest usage of bashisms.) -JimC -- James Cloos <cl...@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
