On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Michael Biebl <mbi...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/9/8 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi>: >> - calling any of /etc/init.d scripts is bad, as it will call openrc >> and it will bring all dependencies on its own, including services >> managed by systemd that are up already. This means we better disable >> sysv support there (more on this later). > > Not sure if disabling sysv support is good idea. > > Without knowing too much about Gentoo and simply looking at what the > Gentoo handbook has to say about Gentoo init scripts [1], > why don't you simply provide an /sbin/runscript implementation which > works with systemd? > That's probably the way I would try to tackle this. > Or is your plan to rip all native Gentoo init scripts at once and > replace them with native systemd service files and have a flag day? > I don't think such an approach will provide a maintainable and smooth > transition.
Well, it's a complex matter. Gentoo was one of the first to provide parallel startup and easy/simple/powerful initscripts, but they came with a price: they opted to do so using Bash and providing/calling some functions. This is simple, extensible but these are not always good. For instance, the parallelization in gentoo also implies pulling deps. So start ssh and it will start network, etc. The network may be up because connmand/networkmanager are running, but gentoo will not know and will execute its own stuff :-/ Another problem is to interpret runscript/initscript files, because it is too flexible, people write things like this: http://www.las.ic.unicamp.br/pub/gentoo-portage/x11-apps/xinit/files/xdm.initd-4 As you can see, while in theory they are easy to parse as they are often: depend() { need x y z; uses a b c; }, the xdm init does lots of bash foo to determine the correct dependencies and this breaks systemd completely :-/ Thus my short term goal is to go with a pure-systemd machine, but of course this does not scale to all systems and having it to be accepted upstream is difficult. Not to say update all documentation/handbooks... actually they even don't recommend openrc/baselayout2 and it is couple of years old yet! I don't have a problem with maintaining my stuff, as in a way or another all Gentoo user must do it. However I believe once Fedora14/15 and others spread the systemd usage, and we have more packages that have upstreamed systemd units, like udev, dbus, bluez, ... we can easily request them to accept an use flag to allow installing/configuring with such support. That's the hardest bit for maintenance. BR, -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
