On Tue, 04.01.11 14:20, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote: > > ]] Lennart Poettering > > | Hmm, so, given that we check PAGER ourselves, calling sensible-pager is > | of little benefit for us, right? And I probably should change the > | invocation of sensible-pager to pager in my code, so that we search for > | "pager", "less" and "more" in this order? > > Sounds fine.
OK, commited this change. > | (That shell script sucks btw, it should invoke the pager with 'exec'.) > > No, since if /bin/sh is dash (at least), you'd then not fall through if > the exec failed due to PAGER pointing to a missing executable. Hmpf. This sounds very much broken, I can't believe POSIX allows that. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
