On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > Hmm, I am kinda keen on keeping the fsck output also in syslog, hence > just switching the output from syslog to tty is not ideal. Maybe we > should add a mechanism so that we can output things to syslog and > console at the same time. (i added this now to the todo list)
I just saw you implemented it. ;) > Another option could be to use -C <fd> to direct the normal output of > fsck to syslog, but the progress bar to the console. The problem is that -C itself prints the nice progressbar, while -C2 (so we could save stdout to log and have stderr on console only) prints out progressbar info which is suitable in case you want to parse it from a GUI. > I guess the combination of -C <fd> to direct the progress bar to the > console plus StandardOutput=syslog+console would be pretty good. the > progress bar makes no sense in the logs anyway. Sure. So - do you have a better idea than poking the e2fsprogs guys to add a new switch (or env var, etc.) that will turn the progressbar on fd != 0 to something user-friendly?
pgpHOa2WkCKxc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
