On Fri, 25.02.11 13:09, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said: > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 04:23:27PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > Well, it hasn't been working correctly in ages. It's really not new > > > policy we came up with here. It's just a warning to the user that setups > > > like this will break. End of story. > > > > Is this flagged for the Fedora 15 release notes? > > Speaking as a non-systemd maintainer, IMO: > > - Issues that arise with separate /usr should likely be fixed
This is not really how we are handling things on Fedora right now. As far as I know there have never been attempts to move all the deps of udisks and the pci/usb database to /, have there? And to be frank, I really wouldn't want to move those, anyway. Sure, in theory one could "fix" all those packages. But that would mean a whole boatload of things would have to move to /. I think it is simpler to just give up on seperate /usr, since there is really no good reason to split it off anyway. Folks who want to do ro /usr are aiming too low, they should go for ro /. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
