On 04/20/2011 06:02 PM, fykc...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/4/21 David Daney<dda...@caviumnetworks.com>:
Any comment whether this will break non-MIPS 32bit archs, like x86?
It would break the MIPS n32 ABI userspace.
On MIPS n32 we are still __LP64__, but 64-bit values are passed in a single
register.
It isn't a problem. n32 syscall supports 64bit registers, and 64-bit
values should be passed in a single register. see
http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.38/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-n32.S#L426
(calls sys_fanotify_mark instead of sys_32_fanotify_mark,
sys_fanotify_mark won't merge_64(mask_low, merge_high))
What are you talking about?
If you split the mask argument across two registers, it will not work in
n32. That is why the mask splitting code must be confined to only the
o32 ABI.
David Daney
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
