Op 5 mei 2011, om 19:54 heeft Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri het volgende geschreven:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Harald Hoyer <harald.ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/src/util.c b/src/util.c
>>> index f0051ee..5af9161 100644
>>> --- a/src/util.c
>>> +++ b/src/util.c
>>> @@ -3426,6 +3426,18 @@ void status_welcome(void) {
>>>
>>> if (!ansi_color)
>>> const_color = "1;35"; /* Bright Magenta for MeeGo */
>>> +#elif defined(TARGET_ANGSTROM)
>>> +
>>> + if (!pretty_name) {
>>> + if ((r = read_one_line_file("/etc/angstrom-version",
>>> &pretty_name)) < 0) {
>>> +
>>> + if (r != -ENOENT)
>>> + log_warning("Failed to read
>>> /etc/angstrom-version: %s", strerror(-r));
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (!ansi_color)
>>> + const_color = "1;35"; /* Bright Magenta for Angstrom */
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> if (!pretty_name && !const_pretty)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Hmm, wouldn't it make sense to symlink
>>
>> "/etc/SuSE-release"
>> "/etc/gentoo-release"
>> "/etc/altlinux-release"
>> "/etc/debian_version"
>> "/etc/mandriva-release"
>> "/etc/meego-release"
>>
>> to "/etc/system-release" or provide "/etc/lsb-release" ???
>>
>> All those #ifdefs are taking overhand...
>
> that would be good! :-) but who has the right/final-world to get these
> distros to do it?
>
> Maybe Koen is in that position with Angstron? :-)
Angstrom now provides /etc/os-release and the offending hunk has been dropping
in the V2 version of the patch. Anything else that needs to get addressed
before the patch can go in?
regards,
Koen
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
