On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:14:40AM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > I would prefer /sys/security for all LSMs, but if SELinux goes with /sys/fs > Smack will likely follow on the theory that mirroring the current dominant > LSM is more likely to please the masses than doing what the greatest number > of LSMs are doing.
Is smack going to create its own filesystem like selinux has, or is it going to use securityfs? If securityfs, then stick with what you have. If you are going to create a new one, I'd be glad to work with you to add anything you might need to securityfs first, but if that doesn't work out, then yes, you could use /sys/fs/ for your new one. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
