On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 13:09, Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no> wrote: > ]] Kay Sievers > > | > Actually I see a contradiction: if /lib is going to become /usr/lib, > | > there's no reason to hard code /usr paths in systemd. Just use /lib > | > until the day comes. But it's irrelevant. > | > | Nah, it's not needed in the rootfs, hence we already put it where the > | rest will move to. And sure, we will change all paths in systemd to be > | prefixed with /usr and not to rely on the existence of the compat > | symlinks. > > Well, unless you break the ELF ABI, /lib and /lib64 won't go away. I > wish we'd just drop /usr as Paolo suggests. Your comment about /include > isn't really true, we'd move that somewhere sensible like /lib.
The point is not to have 6-10 top-level dirs for the system to manage, but only a single one. We need a single point to snapshot or share. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
