On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 23:39, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > Hmm, let me see if I get this right: with this patch applied we'd build > cap and selinux support into libsystemd-basic.la, but we wouldn't link > against the respective libraries but instead do that in the binaries > which pull in the .la?
I did not try, but I suspect we depend on the -ffunction-sections + -Wl,--gc-sections stuff o discard the parts which are compiled but not part of the final binary. I guess without that we would have unresolved symbols. > I am not sure I like this. I mean, I understand the goal, and it's a > good one, but I think if we do this we should do this properly, and > split up util.c so that the stuff that uses caps and selinux is > independent of the rest and can be pulled in individually as needed. Yeah, splitting up seems the only non-tricky way of doing that. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
