On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:29:05AM +0100, Michael Olbrich wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:38:39PM +0100, Michael Olbrich wrote: > > here is a new version of the first 3 patches updated as suggested. > > The actual /dev/watchdog handling is not part of this series. It needs some > > more work to finish.
Ping. Any comments? > so I tried to implement the /dev/watchdog handling inside systemd itself, > but I'm not sure where to put it. > I think it could be done as a unit. However, that would be a new type and > there will only ever be one, so I'm not so sure this is the right way to do > it. A unit would be nice to provide all the infrastructure: enable/disable, > configuration, unit timer, etc. > If not, the configuration could come from the global config file, cmdline > and kernel cmdline, but the rest? > So, to those of you that have a better understanding of the internal design > of systemd: what's the best way to do this? Any hints for this? Michael -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
